Novachem New Zealand Agricultural Manual
Need help?
Contact us
Checkout
Cart empty
Not a subscriber?
Sign in
Novachem Login
Sign in
Subscribe
Industry News
Novachem Newsletter
Home
About
Advertise with us
Policy
Disclaimer
Contact us
NovaChem
>
Industry News
>
2021
>
New to NZ – herbicide classifications change
New to NZ – herbicide classifications change
Published on 02/08/2021
Dr Kerry Harrington, associate
professor in weed science at
Massey University, says up until
now we’ve had a unique hybrid
alpha-numeric MOA classifica
tion system for herbicides regis
tered in NZ.
Originally this was created for
good reason, he says, but 10
years on, it’s time to align our
way of doing things with the rest
of the world.
“When we first introduced an
MOA classification system for
herbicides in NZ, three different
schemes were being used inter
nationally – one in America, one
in Australia, and one that cov
ered Europe and virtually every
one else, which is known as the
HRAC system, because it was
devised by the Herbicide Resist
ance Action Committee.
”
“Under all three schemes, cer
tain MOAs were grouped togeth
er. But we had found that here
in NZ, if you rotated chemistry
within the group, you could con
trol resistant weeds, so that’s
why we modified the HRAC sys
tem to suit our conditions.”
A prime example of this is phe
noxy resistance in nodding this
tles.
In NZ, plants with reduced sus
ceptibility to MCPA and 2-4, D
can still be controlled using
clopyralid.
But under all three existing
overseas classification schemes
at the time, MCPA, 2,4-D and
clopyralid were part of the same
MOA group, making it confusing
for NZ users for whom the key
message in managing resistance
is to rotate between groups, not
within them.
So that’s why clopyralid in NZ
became classified as an O3
MOA, while MCPA and 2,4-D
were classified as O1.
Since then, the numeric HRAC
system has become the domi
nant global classification for
herbicide MOAs, Harrington
says.
At the same time, more and more users turn to the Internet for guidance on resistance management, which raises the risk of further confusion when online overseas MOA references don’t match those on NZ labels.
Changing over will take time: “It’s going to be a bit confusing for the next three to five years.” But as farming continues to become more global, and farmers, agronomists and academics increasingly share information to stay both productive and sustainable, standardised herbicide MOAs will ultimately help the cause.
Harrington says the first step has been to add the ‘new’ HRAC classifications to the existing MOA list maintained by the NZ Plant Protection Society (
www.resistance.nzpps.org
).
Meantime his advice for anyone who uses or recommends herbicides is to always keep resistance in mind, because it’s not going away. “New research which is about to be published, for example, shows there is much more herbicide resistance in the arable cropping areas of Canterbury than first suspected, especially in crops like wheat and barley.”
The 2021/2022 publication of the Novachem manual includes the updated herbicide MOA chart.
Advertisement
Advertisement
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with stylesheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so. The latest version of
Firefox
,
Safari
,
Google Chrome
or
Internet Explorer
will work best if you're after a new browser.